I've shown this trailer to
many people. The reaction has been extremely positive.
There are two reasons
for this success. One is the high quality of the original source
material. The second is the excellent structure of the
trailer, which uses well known film-making techniques.
When creating a
trailer, filmmakers almost universally omit many elements from
the movie's screenplay. So while the BOTB novel and elevator
deck include Ananya's step-parents, boyfriend Rakesh and the
third act, the trailer wisely omits these elements. Those
supporting characters are essential for the finished film,
but including them in the trailer would greatly dilute the
energy of the teaser.
If you watch almost
any trailer, you will see that endings and many supporting
characters are removed. A great example is the Love,
Actually trailer, where critical
characters from the film are completely missing from the promo.
I am following the
Rule of Threes. A) Juju confuses sex with love, B) Siddharth confuses
solitude with freedom, C) Tamana confuses her
insecurities with reality. Because of the Rule of Threes,
there is no fourth example of a character flaw.
Another successful
technique used in our trailer is cinematic rhythm.
For example, after
the 9/11 scene, there are are three seconds of black, followed
by a smash cut to Mumbai. The voice over during the black is as
concise as possible, free from bloat and verbal fluff. So the
line, "...the myth of First World impermeability shattered,"
destroys the rhythm. Including that line too early in the
trailer foreshadows too much and kills the surprise. It walks on
the image. A picture tells a thousand words. And the picture is
already telling a great story.
When the narrator
says, "Manhattan was great...but it was Bollywood that would
change her life," including the words "and Mumbai" is redundant.
It kills the cinematic rhythm.
The line, "Tomorrow
belongs, clearly, to the sexy, sophisticated assistant director,
Siddharth," is too verbose. The viewer already knows that
Siddharth is sexy, purely based on the images. The chemistry
between Tamana and Siddharth is obvious in the video and the
editing. And Juju already feels professionally over the hill
just from the trailer. You don't have to gild the lily.
The voice over should
only say what is not obvious in the video. It should not include
long-winded redundancies. Trailers have much less tolerance for
counter-productive loquaciousness than two-hour films do.
In the opening of the
film Manhattan, Woody Allen's character delivers an
intentionally self indulgent and bloated voice over. Allen
successfully makes fun of his very flawed hero. And Diane
Keaton's character is very funny, precisely because her
dialogue is so ridiculous.
You will remember that
your original voice over for the 35 second Manhattan scene was
140 seconds long.
Less is more.
This trailer is already
a huge success. Even though it omits much of your novel and
film, it will get producers and directors to read your
screenplay and audiences to watch the film. And that is what
matters.
The cinematic rhythm is
working very well.
If it ain't broke,
don't fix it.